US, China

Experts Outline the Balance of Power in Escalating US-China Trade Conflict

President Donald Trump announced sweeping “reciprocal tariffs ” earlier this month, targeting numerous countries like china . However, only one remained on the list—China. In a dramatic escalation, Trump increased tariffs on Chinese goods to a staggering 145%. China responded with 125% tariffs on U.S. goods and issued additional countermeasures.

Yasheng Huang, a professor at MIT, described the situation as a high-stakes confrontation:

“The stakes are extremely high and the only issue remaining is who is going to blink first,” Huang told ABC News.


Economic Dependencies and Disruptions

Meg Rithmire, a business administration professor at Harvard University, noted the complexity of the supply chains linking the two nations.

“It doesn’t seem like this is the kind of thing that will cripple anyone in the short term, but the supply chains are such that it could get messy in the medium term,” she said.

According to Huang, China still depends on the U.S. for certain key technology components.

“It would definitely hurt them — no question about it,” Huang said, acknowledging that while China could handle a temporary shortage, a long-term disruption would create significant problems.


Endurance of Economic Pain

Analysts emphasized structural differences between the two governments. China’s authoritarian system, they said, enables it to weather prolonged economic distress.

“There’s a lot structurally built into the Chinese system to withstand political pain, which isn’t the case for the U.S.,” Rithmire said.
“The U.S. system incorporates the unhappiness of people as they experience the economic effects.”

The difference in COVID-19 response illustrates these political contrasts.

“The trade war, as substantial as it is, doesn’t compare to the COVID lockdown that China implemented,” Huang said.
“We have solid evidence that the political system is quite immune from economic hardship.”

However, Shang-Jin Wei from Columbia University pointed out that the Chinese government’s legitimacy hinges on economic performance:

“Anything that hurts that can undermine their power,” Wei said.

US, China
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping shake hands during a joint statement in Beijing on November 9, 2017. Donald Trump and Xi Jinping put their professed friendship to the test on November 9 as the least popular US president in decades and the newly empowered Chinese leader met for tough talks on trade and North Korea. / AFP PHOTO / JIM WATSON (Photo credit should read JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images)

Trade Interdependence and Vulnerabilities

Both nations remain deeply intertwined economically. The U.S. is China’s largest export market, importing around $438 billion in goods and services last year—accounting for about 15% of China’s total exports.

Yet the U.S. also depends heavily on these imports.

“The U.S. imports more from China than it exports to China — that gives the U.S. an advantage,” Wei told ABC News.
“But the very fact that the U.S. buys so much from them also means that it is dependent on their supply of low-cost goods.”

While China imported only $143 billion in U.S. goods—primarily soybeans, wheat, oil, and gas—those exports supported approximately 930,000 American jobs, according to the U.S.-China Business Council.

The Trump administration did attempt to offset some of this with financial aid:

“During Trump’s first term, the U.S. provided financial relief to some farmers to make up for lost sales to China.”


Strategic Materials as Bargaining Chips

The battle also includes control over critical resources. China has imposed export controls on rare earth elements and specialized magnets used in U.S. defense, energy, and automotive products.

“The U.S. dependency on China for rare earths is extremely high,” Huang said.
“China can shut it off or turn it on at will — that is leverage.”

According to the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), these materials are essential for key U.S. defense systems, including F-35 fighter jets and Tomahawk missiles. CSIS concluded that the U.S. is not yet equipped to substitute these components with domestic production.


Looking Ahead: Political Will and Pathways

Despite the intense economic exchanges, experts suggest the resolution may come down to political incentives.

“Ultimately, the standoff may endure until each country sees a pathway out of the trade spat that promises sufficient political benefit,” the article concludes.
“Is there a productive off-ramp for each side?” Huang asked.

As tariffs, countermeasures, and political strategies escalate, the global economy remains watchful—waiting to see who blinks first.

Possible Signs of Alien Life Detected on Distant Planet K2-18 b